DAVID CARR-SMITH - ART / DESIGN / KITSCH
© DAVID CARR-SMITH : All text is copyrighted - please accredit text qotes. Contact: dave@artinst.entadsl.com
Click on images to enlarge.
20th
CENTURY NEW EXPERIENTIAL INFO FORMS
A
qualitative change of experience, on the scale of, analogous to, and as
unpreconceived as that from 'Gothic' to 'Renaissance', opened near the
beginning of the last century.
Between
1910 and 1920 were developed means of experiential forming which equally and
simultaneously mediated outer object and inner meaning - thus restating
experience as a continuum of physical event and mind content conjoined in the
action of realising a work. These artifacts differ from those of the previous
culture (Renaissance to 19th C) whose identity as external physical things was
not an aspect of their content but simply a medium for mental forming.
The
experiential potential released in the early 20th century is characterised by
the fully independent 'thing' status of the physical aspect of its experiential
forms. First realised as 'art' it increasingly transforms the structure/content
of all modes of mediation/information.
The
following Section dicusses the content and affective operation of this new
forming//new
experiential paradigm in art and advertising images:
PART
1:
Part
1 elucidates and discusses one of the generative objects of this new
structuring of experience and compares it with a mature example from the
previous 'Renaissance' culture:
EG 1:
PICASSO - COLLÉ: VIOLIN, GLASS, NEWSPAPER, BOTTLE -
(1912/13) - (TZARA)
[plus
other Egs between 1910 and 1914 as needed]
Analyse
its structure and functioning:
The picture's 'reality aspects' are
manifold:
- The illusionistically rendered appearance of objects (paint ><
skill) evokes internal 'recognition' and associations (NB: the only 'reality
level' of previous culture pictures).
- The physical 'picture'- made from glued paper, collaged fragments,
charcoal and paint marks - is present in attention as an independent external
thing.
(NB:
EG 2: CLAUDE: in previous culture the physical picture is 'invisible' (except as
the 'tromped' support of tromp l'oeil !)
- Collaged fragments of objects whose independent status is equal to
'picture' itself. However as parts of the picture, displaced from their external
context, they become mental 'images of themselves'. (Thus though the 'outermost'
of the 3 layers they are also the most 'fantastic').
A
consequence of the above is that such a picture is not, as in the previous
culture, a picture of things but has itself ' thing-status' (re:
'tableau-objet'). This 'thing-status' is the external limit of its content.
Since this 'thingness' is itself a structural unit in the configuration of that
content, it is not as in the previous culture simply the limit to the 'reality'
of pictorial illusions, but is the conformation of the actuality of content.
The picture space is multi-valent (as in
Cézanne):
- Each
pictorial-part is the 'centre' (of attention) of a particular structure of
space-relations. Seen from another 'centre' it occupies a different place. The
whole picture is organised differently around each of its parts.
-
The//This multi-spatial order mediates the relations between 'reality-levels':
Example
of one such relationship:

The
GLASS - looked at from the 'realistic' wood-grained VIOLIN side - takes a
position behind the whole face of the violin which slopes back towards it. This
mental 'illusion' is shocking to ones physical sense since the newspaper on
which the glass is drawn, is cut away to leave the silhouette of the violin on
the white paper beneath.
The
physical picture and the visual-mental picture are thus in shocking
contradiction! Their confrontation forces one to give them equal existential
credence and to realise that they are the essential 'inner' and 'outer' aspects
of experience. Such 'pictures' are experiential-forms.
Contrast
EG-1 with a typical picture of the previous ('Renaissance') culture:
EG 2:
CLAUDE
- "EMBARKATION OF DIDO FROM
CARTHAGE" - (16##) - (LON. NG)
-
Analyse what it does and how it works, and in what ways the 20thC and
'Renaissance'
forms differ:
Single
'reality-level', all one 'substance': an illusion of appearances
(paint><skill):
-
A 'magic' dissolution of physical surface - an illusory place in mental
space, completely unrelated to the physical painting or its objective context.
The painting as thing is 'out-of-sight' covered by the illusion of its
subject.
Singular
space: arranged round one focal position:
-
The illusory space recedes from the picture edges in a simple
diminishment towards the point of focus and disappearance - even of illusions!
(A diagram that proves its existence by focusing an infinity).
-
Attention is drawn into this 'distance' and one is 'inside the picture'
as in a dream, the only route to the outside' is admiration of skill.
-
For all its simplicity the
'dreaming' is cleverly articulated: the visual infinity focus, the picture's
centre, is hidden behind the ship of embarkation - the passing out of the
foreground world, the moment of the final loss of Cartage will be seen only from
its deck. The false focus of the setting sun and the false goal of a distant
island increase the pathos of discovering the hidden focal end!
In
contrast, the Picasso is not a 'vision' - it mediates an active relating which
progressively substantiates experience.
PART
2:
Having
established a basis for analysing and understanding the new information-forms
there follows an analysis of Ads in relation to Art:
EG
3:
AD: "LIFE NATURE LIBRARY" - "EXPLORE THE MYSTERIES OF THE UNIVERSE" - (SCIENTIFIC-AMERICAN MAGAZINE - c1970)
-
Though quite poor quality graphic-design this Ad shows characteristics of
post collé form: multivalent space, use of picture-plane as 'reality
confirmer', subject-quotations ('collage').
Analysis
of its structure and sequence:

1:
Left-centre - Einstein's face photo:
- His is a 'Renaissance-type' image: a framed single-space, a centered 'stopped'
subject:
EG:
REMBRANDT
[&/or
others]
kjfhkfjhffh
2:
Attention moves across the sloping book into the page to the top-right photo on
a new deeper 'page-surface', the same plane as the main text:
Top-right photo: "Scientists create the basic substance of life itself":
-
An 'Impressionist-type' image: the picture/event as a single act/moment of
attention
EG:
MANET
/ MONET [&/or
others]

jfg,f,fd,dhfhd,

3:
Attention moves down the text to bottom-right onto front page-surface
again to:
'Cut-Out' mailing-cupon - a piece of the real-page-surface: with obscured though 'fascinating' covers of "Life Library" books poking up 'behind' (cut it off and you'll posess the book !).
- 'Collage-type': a spatial joke:
EG:
ERNST
- "LOPLOP PRESENTS" [&/or
others]
jjjjgggddkdkkd

4:
The whole Ad is a (though patchy and inefficient) multi-real,
multi-spatial structure. 3D space is (usually) relative to the real-surface
plane.
Vision
is directed by relationships which are unique to their centre-of-attention.
'Collé-type'
treatment of image as collection of spatially/semantically related fragments.
Manipulation
of response/meaning - through experientially different image types with a
'reality' independent of the Ad context.
- 60 years after the first experiential innovations this apparantly
rather dull and commonplace info-image presents a post-collé vernacular:
EG: AD (c1970)
EG: PICASSO (1912)